Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has progressed gradually in recent years and remains the starting point for most symptomatic patients seeking treatment. Beyond well-known alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, there is growing evidence for the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and beta-3 agonists in managing the condition, which may afford additional relief of "bothersome" symptoms in some patients. This review details contemporary medical management of BPH with an emphasis on the indications for certain classes of pharmacotherapy and their relative benefits and side effects. Surgical and procedural treatment of BPH is covered in a separate review.

Tadalafil versus tamsulosin as combination therapy with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary and sexual outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the urological and sexual outcomes of using either tamsulosin/finateride or tadalafil/finasteride as combination therapies in patients with large prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selection criteria included prostate volume > 40 ml and IPSS > 7. Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (IIEF-erectile functions ≤ 10) were excluded. Patients were randomized into group I (tamsulosin/finasteride) and group II (tadalafil/finasteride). The primary endpoint was to define urinary and sexual function changes (IPSS, IPSS-quality of life, urinary flow rates and IIEF domains) within each group. The secondary endpoint was to compare the treatment induced changes between both groups. RESULTS: At 4th and 12th weeks, 131 and 127 patients were available in both groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant LUTS improvement (IPSS changes: - 4.9 ± 2.7 and - 4.3 ± 2.9 at 4th week and - 6.1 ± 3 and - 5.4 ± 2.8 points by the 12th week in both groups, respectively). Group I had better average flow rates at both follow-up visits. Meanwhile, maximum flow rates were comparable in both groups at 12th week (13.5 ± 3.9vs. 12.6 ± 3.7, p > 0.05). In group I, all IIEF domains were significantly lowered at both visits (p < 0.05). Group II showed significant increase in IIEF-erectile function scores (1.3 ± 1.1 and 1.8 ± 1.2 at the 4th and 12th weeks) with a transient significant reduction of IIEF-orgasm and sexual desire noted only by the 4th week (- 0.8 ± 0.4 and - 0.6 ± 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSION: Within three months, both combinations are comparably effective in improving BPH related LUTS. Tamsulosin/finasteride provided significantly better Qmax only at 4th week. Tadalafil/finasteride had the advantage of improving sexual performance over the other combination.

Therapeutic maintenance effect of finasteride 1 mg every other month regimen in androgenetic alopecia and study on the difference in response to finasteride treatment: A prospective cohort study.

Finasteride is commonly used for androgenetic alopecia (AGA) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic maintenance effect of a finasteride every other month (EOM) regimen and analyze clinical and laboratory differences in patients with AGA according to their treatment response. One hundred males with AGA who received finasteride 1 mg daily treatment for a year were enrolled in the study. At 1 year follow-up, treatment responses of patients who completed the visit schedule were assessed using five scales. The patients were assigned to good or bad response groups according to their assessment. Further, they were randomly divided into two groups (daily vs. EOM) and treated with finasteride (1 mg) for 1 more year. At 2 years follow-up, treatment efficacy was assessed. At 1-year follow-up, 36 patients completed the schedule, including eight and three patients in the good and bad response groups, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, 23 patients completed the schedule, with nine in the daily group and 14 in the EOM group. Changes in global photographic assessment in the second year were 1.33 and 1.29 for the daily and EOM groups, respectively. The daily group showed an elevated hair density and lower concentration of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and the DHT to testosterone ratio (DHT/T). However, the EOM group showed decreased hair density and elevated DHT and DHT/T. Following treatment response assessment after 1 year of treatment, the good response group showed early onset which was associated with maternal AGA. Analysis of serum androgen hormone magnitude of DHT reduction was much greater (54.4% vs. 44.4%). DHT/T was higher in the bad response group (1.98 vs. 2.33). We concluded that the finasteride EOM regimen showed similar maintenance effects to the daily regimen.

Transcriptomic analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia identifies critical pathways in prostatic overgrowth and 5-alpha reductase inhibitor resistance.

BACKGROUND: The medical therapy of prostatic symptoms (MTOPS) trial randomized men with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and followed response of treatment with a 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI), an alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonist (α-blocker), the combination of 5ARI and α-blocker or no medical therapy (none). Medical therapy reduced risk of clinical progression by 66% but the reasons for nonresponse or loss of therapeutic response in some patients remains unresolved. Our previous work showed that prostatic glucocorticoid levels are increased in 5ARI-treated patients and that glucocorticoids can increased branching of prostate epithelia in vitro. To understand the transcriptomic changes associated with 5ARI treatment, we performed bulk RNA sequencing of BPH and control samples from patients who received 5ARI versus those that did not. Deconvolution analysis was performed to estimate cellular composition. Bulk RNA sequencing was also performed on control versus glucocorticoid-treated prostate epithelia in 3D culture to determine underlying transcriptomic changes associated with branching morphogenesis. METHOD: Surgical BPH (S-BPH) tissue was defined as benign prostatic tissue collected from the transition zone (TZ) of patients who failed medical therapy while control tissue termed Incidental BPH (I-BPH) was obtained from the TZ of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for low-volume/grade prostatic adenocarcinoma confined to the peripheral zone. S-BPH patients were divided into four subgroups: men on no medical therapy (none: n = 7), α-blocker alone (n = 10), 5ARI alone (n = 6) or combination therapy (α-blocker and 5ARI: n = 7). Control I-BPH tissue was from men on no medical therapy (none: n = 8) or on α-blocker (n = 6). A human prostatic cell line in 3D culture that buds and branches was used to identify genes involved in early prostatic growth. Snap-frozen prostatic tissue taken at the time of surgery and 3D organoids were used for RNA-seq analysis. Bulk RNAseq data were deconvoluted using CIBERSORTx. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) that were statistically significant among S-BPH, I-BPH, and during budding and branching of organoids were used for pathway analysis. RESULTS: Transcriptomic analysis between S-BPH (n = 30) and I-BPH (n = 14) using a twofold cutoff (p < 0.05) identified 377 DEG (termed BPH377) and a cutoff < 0.05 identified 3377 DEG (termed BPH3377). Within the S-BPH, the subgroups none and α-blocker were compared to patients on 5ARI to reveal 361 DEG (termed 5ARI361) that were significantly changed. Deconvolution analysis of bulk RNA seq data with a human prostate single cell data set demonstrated increased levels of mast cells, NK cells, interstitial fibroblasts, and prostate luminal cells in S-BPH versus I-BPH. Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced budding and branching of benign prostatic cells in 3D culture was compared to control organoids to identify early events in prostatic morphogenesis. GC induced 369 DEG (termed GC359) in 3D culture. STRING analysis divided the large datasets into 20-80 genes centered around a hub. In general, biological processes induced in BPH supported growth and differentiation such as chromatin modification and DNA repair, transcription, cytoskeleton, mitochondrial electron transport, ubiquitination, protein folding, and cholesterol synthesis. Identified signaling pathways were pooled to create a list of DEG that fell into seven hubs/clusters. The hub gene centrality was used to name the network including AP-1, interleukin (IL)-6, NOTCH1 and NOTCH3, NEO1, IL-13, and HDAC/KDM. All hubs showed connections to inflammation, chromatin structure, and development. The same approach was applied to 5ARI361 giving multiple networks, but the EGF and sonic hedgehog (SHH) hub was of particular interest as a developmental pathway. The BPH3377, 5ARI363, and GC359 lists were compared and 67 significantly changed DEG were identified. Common genes to the 3D culture included an IL-6 hub that connected to genes identified in BPH hubs that defined AP1, IL-6, NOTCH, NEO1, IL-13, and HDAC/KDM. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction analysis of BPH and 3D organoid culture uncovered networks previously identified in prostatic development as being reinitiated in BPH. Identification of these pathways provides insight into the failure of medical therapy for BPH and new therapeutic targets for BPH/LUTS.

The relative effect of monotherapy with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and minoxidil for female pattern hair loss: A network meta-analysis study.

BACKGROUND: Minoxidil and the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), specifically, dutasteride and finasteride, are usually used to treat pattern hair loss (PHL), but evidence on the relative effectiveness of these drugs is far less for women than men. AIMS: We performed an age-adjusted network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the comparative efficacy of monotherapy with the three agents-in any dosage and administrative route-on PHL in adult women. METHODS: The peer-reviewed literature was systematically reviewed to obtain data for our NMA. The outcome measure for our NMA was "change in total hair density." We referred to "regimen" as an "agent and its dosage;" our Bayesian NMA estimated regimens' surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and pairwise relative effects. RESULTS: Our NMA used data from 13 trials-across which the following 10 regimens were identified (in decreasing order of SUCRA): 5 mg/day finasteride for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 95.7%), 5% topical minoxidil solution twice daily for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 89.5%), 1 mg/day minoxidil for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 78.1%), 5% topical minoxidil foam 1 half capful/day for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 66.5%), 3% topical minoxidil solution 1 mL twice daily for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 45.1%), 2% topical minoxidil solution 1 mL twice daily for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 44.6%), 5% topical minoxidil solution 1 mL/day for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 41.7%), 0.25 mg/day minoxidil for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 35.5%), 1.25 mg/day finasteride for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 24.8%) and 1 mg/day finasteride for 24 weeks (SUCRA = 4.3%). CONCLUSION: Our findings can improve clinical guidelines and help dermatologists manage female PHL more optimally with the available options.

A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel trial comparing the efficacy of α-blocker or 5α-reductase inhibitor withdrawal to continued combination therapy on the maintenance of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain how long combination therapy should be continued in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We investigated the withdrawal effects of α1-adrenergic receptor blocker (AB) or 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) following successful combination therapy. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel trial enrolled 222 patients with BPH/LUTS who showed at least a seven-point improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score-total (IPSS-T) and a ≥ 20% reduction in prostate volume (PV) following the initiation of combination therapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into continued-combination, AB-withdrawal, and 5ARI-withdrawal groups. IPSS, overactive bladder symptom score, EuroQol-five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), prostate volume (PV), maximal flow rate, postvoid residual urine (PVR), and prostate-specific antigen level were assessed every 6 months for 24 months. The predictors of IPSS-T deterioration were evaluated. RESULTS: At Month 24, IPSS-T deterioration (≥2 point) was observed in 20/72 (27.8%) and 19/72 (26.4%) patients in the AB- and 5ARI-withdrawal groups, respectively. Among them, 4/72 (5.6%) and 4/70 (5.7%) patients required readdition of the withdrawn drug (p = 0.868). In the continued combination group, EQ-VAS improved at Month 24 compared to baseline (p = 0.028). At Month 24, the AB-withdrawal group showed improvements in EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and PVR (all p < 0.005), while the 5ARI-withdrawal group showed improvement in IPSS-S (p = 0.011). Diabetes mellitus was associated with IPSS-T deterioration at Month 24 (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BPH/LUTS who are reluctant to continue combination therapy, AB or 5ARI withdrawal may be offered in men with improvement in IPSS-T by at least seven points and reduction in PV by at least 20%.

Virtual screening approach for the discovery of selective 5α-reductase type II inhibitors for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment.

Background: 5α-Reductase type II (5αR2) inhibition is a promising strategy for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment. A computational approach including virtual screening, ligand-based 3D pharmacophore modeling, 2D quantitative structure-activity relationship and molecular docking simulations were adopted to develop novel inhibitors. Results: Hits were first filtered via the validated pharmacophore and 2D quantitative structure-activity relationship models. Docking on the recently determined cocrystallized structure of 5αR2 showed three promising hits. Visual inspection results were compared with finasteride ligand and dihydrotestosterone as reference, to explain the role of binding to Glu57 and Tyr91 for 5αR2 selective inhibition. Conclusion: Alignment between Hit 2 and finasteride in the binding pocket showed similar binding modes. The biological activity prediction showed antitumor and androgen targeting activity of the new hits.

Exploring the Enigma of 5-ARIs Resistance in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Paving the Path for Personalized Medicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the widespread utilization of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), certain BPH patients exhibit unresponsiveness to 5-ARIs therapy. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current perspectives on the mechanisms of 5-ARIs resistance in BPH patients and integrates potential biomarkers and underlying therapeutic options for 5-ARIs resistance. These findings may facilitate the development of novel or optimize more effective treatment options, and promote personalized medicine for BPH. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathways contributing to resistance against 5-ARIs in certain BPH patients encompass epigenetic modifications, shifts in hormone levels, autophagic processes, and variations in androgen receptor structures, and these pathways may ultimately be attributed to inflammation. Promisingly, novel biomarkers, including intravesical prostatic protrusion, inflammatory factors, and single nucleotide polymorphisms, may offer predictive insights into the responsiveness to 5-ARIs therapy, empowering physicians to fine-tune treatment strategies. Additionally, on the horizon, GV1001 and mTOR inhibitors have emerged as potential alternative therapeutic modalities for addressing BPH in the future. After extensive investigation into BPH's pathological processes and molecular landscape, it is now recognized that diverse pathophysiological mechanisms may contribute to different BPH subtypes among individuals. This insight necessitates the adoption of personalized treatment strategies, moving beyond the prevailing one-size-fits-all paradigm centered around 5-ARIs. The imperative for early identification of individuals prone to treatment resistance will drive physicians to proactively stratify risk and adapt treatment tactics in future practice. This personalized medicine approach marks a progression from the current standard treatment model, emerging as the future trajectory in BPH management.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if exposure to 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) modifies the effect of MRI for the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) (ISUP Gleason grade ≥ 2). METHODS: This study is a multicenter cohort study including patients undergoing prostate biopsy and MRI at 24 institutions between 2013 and 2022. Multivariable analysis predicting csPCa with an interaction term between 5-ARIs and PIRADS score was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of MRI were compared in treated and untreated patients. RESULTS: 705 patients (9%) were treated with 5-ARIs [median age 69 years, Interquartile range (IQR): 65, 73; median PSA 6.3 ng/ml, IQR 4.0, 9.0; median prostate volume 53 ml, IQR 40, 72] and 6913 were 5-ARIs naïve (age 66 years, IQR 60, 71; PSA 6.5 ng/ml, IQR 4.8, 9.0; prostate volume 50 ml, IQR 37, 65). MRI showed PIRADS 1-2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions in 141 (20%), 158 (22%), 258 (37%), and 148 (21%) patients treated with 5-ARIs, and 878 (13%), 1764 (25%), 2948 (43%), and 1323 (19%) of untreated patients (p < 0.0001). No difference was found in csPCa detection rates, but diagnosis of high-grade PCa (ISUP GG ≥ 3) was higher in treated patients (23% vs 19%, p = 0.013). We did not find any evidence of interaction between PIRADS score and 5-ARIs exposure in predicting csPCa. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PIRADS ≥ 3 were 94%, 29%, 46%, and 88% in treated patients and 96%, 18%, 43%, and 88% in untreated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to 5-ARIs does not affect the association of PIRADS score with csPCa. Higher rates of high-grade PCa were detected in treated patients, but most were clearly visible on MRI as PIRADS 4 and 5 lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05078359.

5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) with or without alpha-blockers (α-B) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia do NOT lower the risk of incident Bladder Cancer: United States insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Chemoprotective effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) on bladder cancer (BCa) risk in men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has been explored with conflicting results. We sought to examine the effect of 5-ARi on new BCa diagnoses in a large US database. METHODS: Men ≥ 50 y/o with a prescription for 5-ARi after BPH diagnosis were identified in the IBM® Marketscan® Research de-identified Databases between 2007 and 2016 and matched with paired controls. Incident BCa diagnoses were identified after BPH diagnosis and/or pharmacologic treatment. Multivariable regression modeling adjusting for relevant factors was implemented. Sub-group analyses by exposure risk were performed to explore the association between 5-ARi and BCa over time. Administration of alpha-blockers (α-B) w/o 5-ARi was also examined. RESULTS: In total, n = 24,036 men on 5-ARi, n = 107,086 on 5-ARi plus alpha-blockers, and n = 894,275 without medical therapy for BPH were identified. The percentage of men diagnosed with BCa was 0.8% for the 5-ARi, 1.4% for the 5-ARi + α-B, and 0.6% for the untreated BPH group of incident BCa (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 - 1.47), and 1.08, 95%CI 0.89 - 1.30, respectively). This was also true at both shorter (≤ 2 yr) and longer-term (> 2 yr) follow up. In addition, α-B alone had no change in BCa risk (HR 1.06, 0.86-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any diminished risk of new BCa in men treated with 5-ARi (i.e., chemoprotective effect). The current report suggests that 5-ARi do not change a man's bladder cancer risk.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Rapid Evidence Review.

Lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic hyperplasia affect 25% of U.S. men, nearly one-half of whom have at least moderate symptoms. Sedentary lifestyle, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus increase risk of symptoms. Evaluation is focused on determining severity of symptoms and therapy to improve symptoms. Rectal examination has limited accuracy in evaluating prostate size. Transrectal ultrasonography is preferred to verify size when starting 5-alpha reductase therapy or considering surgery. Serum prostate-specific antigen testing is not recommended in routine evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms, and shared decision-making should be used for cancer screening decisions. The International Prostate Symptom Score is the best way to track symptoms. Self-management methods, including limiting evening fluid intake, reducing caffeine and alcohol intake, toilet and bladder training, pelvic floor exercises, and mindfulness techniques, can improve symptoms. Although saw palmetto is not effective, the herbal treatments Pygeum africanum and beta-sitosterol may be effective. Primary medical treatment involves alpha blockers or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Alpha blockers offer rapid benefit and can be used for acute urinary retention. Combining alpha blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors is not beneficial. For uncontrolled symptoms, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors should be started if the prostate volume is 30 mL or greater by ultrasonography. 5-Alpha reductase inhibitors take up to one year to be fully beneficial and are more effective when taken with alpha blockers. Only 1% of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms require surgery. Although transurethral resection of the prostate improves symptoms, many less invasive options with varying effectiveness can be considered.

Use of 5α-reductase inhibitors and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that the use of the anti-androgenic drug 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) improves survival in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer. METHODS: This nationwide Swedish population-based cohort study included men who underwent surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer between 2006-2015, with follow-up until the end of 2020. Multivariable Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) for associations between 5-ARIs use and 5-year all-cause mortality (main outcome) and 5-year disease-specific mortality (secondary outcome). The HR was adjusted for age, comorbidity, education, calendar year, neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, tumour stage, and resection margin status. RESULTS: Among 1769 patients with oesophago-gastric cancer, 64 (3.6%) were users of 5-ARIs. Compared to non-users, users of 5-ARIs were not at any decreased risk of 5-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.79-1.63) or 5-year disease-specific mortality (adjusted HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79-1.52). Use of 5-ARIs was not associated with any decreased risk of 5-year all-cause mortality in subgroup analyses stratified by categories of age, comorbidity, tumour stage, or tumour subtype (oesophageal or cardia adenocarcinoma, non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, or oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma). CONCLUSION: This study did not support the hypothesis of improved survival among users of 5-ARIs after curatively intended treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer.

Association of 5α-Reductase Inhibitor Prescription With Bladder Cancer Progression in Males in South Korea.

Importance: The antiandrogenic effect of the 5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) has been investigated for its role in preventing male-predominant cancers. Although 5-ARI has been widely associated with prostate cancer, its association with urothelial bladder cancer (BC), another cancer experienced predominantly by males, has been less explored. Objective: To assess the association between 5-ARI prescription prior to BC diagnosis and reduced risk of BC progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed patient claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. The nationwide cohort included all male patients with BC diagnosis in this database from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2019. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance the covariates between 2 treatment groups: α-blocker only group and 5-ARI plus α-blocker group. Data were analyzed from April 2021 to March 2023. Exposure: Newly dispensed prescriptions of 5-ARIs at least 12 months prior to cohort entry (BC diagnosis), with a minimum of 2 prescriptions filled. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the risks of bladder instillation and radical cystectomy, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. To compare the risk of outcomes, the hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model and difference in restricted mean survival time analysis. Results: The study cohort initially included 22 845 males with BC. After propensity score matching, 5300 patients each were assigned to the α-blocker only group (mean [SD] age, 68.3 [8.8] years) and 5-ARI plus α-blocker group (mean [SD] age, 67.8 [8.6] years). Compared with the α-blocker only group, the 5-ARI plus α-blocker group had a lower risk of mortality (adjusted HR [AHR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.91), bladder instillation (crude HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92), and radical cystectomy (AHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The differences in restricted mean survival time were 92.6 (95% CI, 25.7-159.4) days for all-cause mortality, 88.1 (95% CI, 25.2-150.9) days for bladder instillation, and 68.0 (95% CI, 31.6-104.3) days for radical cystectomy. The incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 85.59 (95% CI, 80.53-90.88) for bladder instillation and 19.57 (95% CI, 17.41-21.91) for radical cystectomy in the α-blocker only group and 66.43 (95% CI, 62.22-70.84) for bladder instillation and 13.56 (95% CI, 11.86-15.45) for radical cystectomy in the 5-ARI plus α-blocker group. Conclusions and relevance: Results of this study suggest an association between prediagnostic prescription of 5-ARI and reduced risk of BC progression.

How Would You Manage This Patient With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia? : Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in older patients assigned male sex at birth, regardless of gender identity, and treatment of these symptoms is therefore common in primary care practice. In 2021, the American Urological Association published guidelines for management of BPH. They recommend using a standardized scoring system such as the International Prostate Symptom Score to help establish a diagnosis and to monitor the efficacy of interventions, α-blockers as the first-choice pharmacotherapy option, and 5α-reductase inhibitors for patients with prostate size estimated to be at least 30 cc. Tadalafil is another option regardless of erectile dysfunction. Combination therapies with α-blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors, anticholinergic agents, or ß3-agonists are effective options. A surgical referral is warranted if the BPH results in chronic kidney disease, refractory urinary retention, or recurrent urinary tract infections; if there is concern for bladder or prostate cancer; or if symptoms do not respond to medical therapy. In this article, a general internal medicine physician and a urologist discuss the treatment options and how they would apply their recommendations to a patient who wishes to learn more about his options.

Effects of dutasteride and tamsulosin on penile morphology in a rodent model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the penile morphology after the isolated and combined administration of dutasteride and tamsulosin in a rodent model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty male rats were assigned into the following groups: Control group (C, receiving distilled water, n=10); Dutasteride group (D, receiving 0.5 mg/Kg/day of dutasteride, n=10); Tamsulosin group (T, receiving 0.4 mg/Kg/day of tamsulosin, n=10); and Dutasteride associated with Tamsulosin group (DT, receiving both drugs n = 10). All drugs were administered via oral gavage. After 40 days, the animals were submitted to euthanasia and their penises were collected for histomorphometric analyses. Data were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test, considering p<0.05 as significant. RESULTS: The sinusoidal space and smooth muscle fiber surface densities (Sv), and the cross-sectional penile areas of rats in groups D, T and DT were reduced in comparison to controls with the most notable reductions in the combined therapy group. The connective tissue and elastic system fibers Sv were augmented in groups D, T and DT in comparison with the control group, again with the most pronounced changes observed in animals receiving the combined therapy. CONCLUSION: Both treatments with dutasteride or tamsulosin promoted penile morphometric modifications in a rodent model. The combination therapy resulted in more notable modifications. The results of this study may help to explain the erectile dysfunction observed in some men using these drugs.

The effect of 5-α reductase inhibitor on Th1, Th2, and Th17 cell-related inflammatory response in BPH.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 5-α reductase inhibitor on the expression of inflammation-related cytokines in Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) specimens after transurethral prostatic resection (TUR-P). METHODS: We prospectively examined the expression of inflammation-related cytokines with immunohistochemistry in the paraffin blocks of 60 patients who underwent TUR-P. 30 cases in the 5-α-reductase inhibitor group were treated with finasteride, 5 mg qd, for more than 6 months; 30 cases in the control group were not treated with medicine before operation. HE staining was used to analyze the difference of inflammation reaction between the two groups, and immunohistochemical staining was used to analyze the effect of 5-α reductase inhibitor on the expression of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), Interleukin-4 (IL-4), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Interleukin-17 (IL-17), Interleukin-21 (IL-21) and Interleukin-23 (IL-23) in prostatic tissue. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the location, range and degree of inflammation between the two groups (P > 0.05). When IL-17 expression was low, there was statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Bcl-2 expression was positively correlated with IL-2, IL-4, IL-6 and IFN-γ (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the expression of IL-21, IL-23 and high expression of IL-17 between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 5-α Reductase inhibitor can inhibit the expression of Bcl-2 in prostatic tissue and the inflammatory response related to T-helper cell 1 (Th1) and T-helper cell 2 (Th2) cells. However, it did not affect Th17 cell-related inflammatory response.

5-alpha reductase inhibitors and MRI prostates: actively reducing prostate sizes and ambiguity.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are increasingly first-line investigations for suspected prostate cancer, and essential in the decision for biopsy. 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use has been shown to reduce prostate size and prostate cancer risk. However, insufficient data exists on how 5-ARI use affects MRI findings and yield of biopsy. This study explores the differences in imaging and prostate cancer diagnoses between patients receiving and not receiving 5-ARI therapy. METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, we collected retrospective data of consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy at one centre. We included patients who were biopsy-naïve, had prior negative biopsies, or on active surveillance for low-grade prostate cancer. Clinical and pathological data was collected, including 5-ARI use, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) classification and biopsy results. RESULTS: 351 men underwent saturation biopsy with or without targeted biopsies. 54 (15.3%) had a history of 5-ARI use. On mpMRI, there was no significant difference between the 5ARI and non-5-ARI groups in PIRADS distribution, number of lesions, and lesion location. Significantly fewer cancers were detected in the 5-ARI group (46.3% vs. 68.0%; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in PIRADS distribution in 5-ARI patients with positive and negative biopsy. CONCLUSION: Our study found significant differences in biochemical, imaging and biopsy characteristics between 5-ARI and non-5-ARI groups. While both groups had similar PIRADS distribution, 5-ARI patients had a lower rate of positive biopsies across all PIRADS categories, which may suggest that the use of 5ARI may confound MRI findings. Further studies on how 5-ARI therapy affects the imaging characteristics of prostate cancer should be performed.